-JMA Pham v. Alameida, et al
| Duy Pham |
| Edward S Alameida, Jr and R J Ryan |
| 3:2003cv00462 |
| March 7, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kern |
| William Q. Hayes |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
ORDER: (1) Denying Second Amended Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 127 ); (2) Denying Request For Discovery; (3) Denying Evidentiary Hearing Request And (4) Granting A Certificate Of Appealability as to claims two and three of the Second Amended Petition and Petitioner's discovery request. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/6/2013. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER: The Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Petition and Application to Stay Proceedings Pending Exhaustion of State Court Remedies (Doc. 115 ) is granted. No later than 10 days from the date this Order is filed, Petitioner shall file the p roposed Second Amended Petition which is attached to the Motion. (Doc. 115 -2.) This action is stayed for 90 days from the date this Order is filed. No later than 75 days from the date this Order is filed, Petitioner shall file with this Court a status report regarding Petitioner's efforts to exhaust claims six and seven of the Second Amended Petition. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/25/2011. (mdc) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER: The 107 Report and Recommendation is adopted in part andnot adopted in part. Claim two of the First Amended Petition (Doc. # 21 ) is not procedurally defaulted. To the extent Petitioner contends that claim two encompasses a claim of prosecutorial misconduct related to Dong and Lonnie's alleged romantic interludes in the prosecutor's office, this claim is unexhausted. Petitioner's request for discovery is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 5/28/10. (pdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
