Marella v. Terhune, et al

Case Number: 3:2003cv00660
Filed: April 2, 2003
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
Referring Judge: Anthony J. Battaglia
Presiding Judge: Roger T. Benitez
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 13, 2011 128 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Adopting 127 Report and Recommendation and Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 9/12/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
January 7, 2011 119 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: 1) Setting Briefing Schedule for Supplemental Briefing; and 2) Providing Plaintiff Notice Pursuant Klingele / Rand. Defendants shall on or before January 25, 2011, file and personally serve upon the Plaintiff: 1) supplemental briefing on these issues and 2) a copy of this Order. The Plaintiff shall file his opposition to Defendants' supplemental brief on or before February 15, 2011. Should the Defendants wish to file a reply to the Plaintiffs opposition, they must do so on or before February 22, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/7/2011.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marella v. Terhune, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?