-WMC Vasquez v. Pliler
Petitioner: Ricardo Vasquez
Respondent: Cheryl Pliler
Case Number: 3:2003cv02194
Filed: November 6, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dana M. Sabraw
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER: (1) Overruling Petitioner's Objection; (2) Adopting 51 the Report and Recommendation; (3) Denying the Petition for Habeas Corpus; and (4) Denying a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 5/26/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lao)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: -WMC Vasquez v. Pliler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ricardo Vasquez
Represented By: Jami L Ferrara
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Cheryl Pliler
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?