Spikes v. Walchef, et al
Plaintiff: Karel Spikes
Defendant: Luben S Walchef doing business as Country Choice Resturant and Catering, Luben S Walchef Trust and Does DOES 1 through 10
Case Number: 3:2004cv00034
Filed: January 7, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
Presiding Judge: Barbara Lynn Major
Referring Judge: Thomas J Whelan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 7, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Stipulation and Order by Judge Thomas J. Whelan: It is ordered that the complaint of Karel Spikes is dismissed with prejudice; Each party shall bear its, his or her own costs and fees, except as set forth in the settlement agreement terminating case (axr) Modified on 05/10/2004
April 19, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order by Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major; a stipulation for dismissal has been filed in this case; settlement disposition conf scheduled for 4/20/04 at 1:00pm is vacated (axr)
March 18, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order by Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major; E.N.E. Conference vacated 1:30 3/19/04; Settlement Dispo Conf set for 1:00 4/20/04 before Mag Judge Barbara Lynn Major (dkt clerk)
February 10, 2004 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order by Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major; E.N.E. Conference set for 1:30 3/19/04 before Mag Judge Barbara Lynn Major (dkt clerk)
February 4, 2004 Filing 4 Answer to complaint by defendant Luben S Walchef, defendant Walchef Trust; jury demand (dkt clerk)
January 27, 2004 Filing 3 Return of Service of summons and complaint executed upon defendant Luben S Walchef on 1/12/04 by personal svc (dkt clerk)
January 7, 2004 Filing 2 Summons issued as to defendant Luben S Walchef, defendant Walchef Trust, defendant DOES (dkt clerk)
January 7, 2004 Filing 1 Complaint Filed; jury demand, (referred to Magistrate Judge Barbara L. Major ) Receipt No/Amt of Fee: 099968/$150 (dkt clerk) Modified on 01/13/2004

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Spikes v. Walchef, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karel Spikes
Represented By: Amy B. Vandeveld
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luben S Walchef doing business as Country Choice Resturant and Catering
Represented By: Edward W Freedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Luben S Walchef Trust
Represented By: Edward W Freedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does DOES 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?