Michaels v. Ornoski, et al
| 3:2004cv00122 |
| January 16, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
160
ORDER: (1) Denying Respondent's Request to Dismiss Certain Claims on the Basis of State Procedural Bars; (2) Denying Evidentiary Hearing or Discovery; and (3) Denying Habeas Relief on Claims 1, 19, 22, 24, 27-31, 45-53, 55-73, and 75-77. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 12/12/2014.(knb)
|
|
Filing
140
TRANSFER ORDER. It is hereby ordered that this case be transferred from the calendar of the Honorable David H. Bartick, to the calendar of the Honorable Jill L. Burkhardt for all further proceedings. All conference or hearing dates set before Magist rate Judge Bartick, if any, are VACATED and will be rescheduled before Magistrate Judge Burkhardt. Any dates set before any district judge remain unchanged. The new case number is 04cv122 JAH (JLB). Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 03/28/14.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jcj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Michaels v. Ornoski, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
