Michaels v. Ornoski, et al

Case Number: 3:2004cv00122
Filed: January 16, 2004
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 12, 2014 160 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: (1) Denying Respondent's Request to Dismiss Certain Claims on the Basis of State Procedural Bars; (2) Denying Evidentiary Hearing or Discovery; and (3) Denying Habeas Relief on Claims 1, 19, 22, 24, 27-31, 45-53, 55-73, and 75-77. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 12/12/2014.(knb)
March 28, 2014 140 Opinion or Order of the Court TRANSFER ORDER. It is hereby ordered that this case be transferred from the calendar of the Honorable David H. Bartick, to the calendar of the Honorable Jill L. Burkhardt for all further proceedings. All conference or hearing dates set before Magist rate Judge Bartick, if any, are VACATED and will be rescheduled before Magistrate Judge Burkhardt. Any dates set before any district judge remain unchanged. The new case number is 04cv122 JAH (JLB). Signed by Magistrate Judge David H. Bartick on 03/28/14.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jcj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Michaels v. Ornoski, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?