Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican, et al
| 3:2005cv01660 |
| August 22, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Napoleon A. Jones |
| William McCurine |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
377
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 364 Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs and Other Expenses: Plaintiff is awarded $484,240.00 in fees for work performed by Ms Vandeveld, $32,945.00 in fees for work performe d by Mr. Ferleger, $1908.75 in copy costs associated with Plaintiffs opposition to the petition for certiorari, $6,690.55 in "costs," and $19,294.75 in "litigation expenses", for a total award of $545,079.05. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 7/17/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (rlu)
|
|
Filing
360
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Judgment is in favor of Plaintiff and against the Defendant in the amount of $5,000 in damages. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (ecs)
|
|
Filing
304
ORDER granting 295 Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Napoleon A. Jones, Jr on 05/15/09. (bjb) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
