Feiger v. Hickman, et al

Case Number: 3:2005cv01754
Filed: September 9, 2005
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Referring Judge: Peter C. Lewis
Presiding Judge: M. James Lorenz
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 5, 2011 41 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Denying Request for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 40 ). At the time petitioner filed his Notice of Appeal, this Court reviewed petitioner's original request for a COA as to all the claims raised in his petition and found a COA unwa rranted as to the remaining claims. Petitioner has not presented any new legal or factual basis for a COA to issue as to those claims. Further, petitioner's appeal has been completed and he is not entitled to a second appeal. Accordingly, petitioner's request for a COA is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/5/2011. (Order electronically transmitted to US Court of Appeals. All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (akr)
September 2, 2008 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 9/2/2008. (cc: USCA). (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(akr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Feiger v. Hickman, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?