Jones v. Carrizo Gorge, et al
Plaintiff: Barry Jones
Defendant: Carrizo Gorge Railway, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 3:2005cv01934
Filed: October 11, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
Presiding Judge: Jan M Adler
Referring Judge: Thomas J Whelan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2006. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2006 Transcript filed of proceedings before Magistrate Judge Adler on 01/20/06 in San Diego, CA (dkt clerk)
February 21, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Order by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler; The Settlement Disposition Conference currently scheduled on 02/17/06 at 4:00 is vacated (dkt clerk)
February 16, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Stipulation and Order by Judge Thomas J. Whelan : The action is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to the settlement reached at the 01/20/06 Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; All parties to bear their own attorney's fees and costs; terminating case (dkt clerk)
January 24, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler: E.N.E. Conference was held 2:00 1/20/06; The case settled; Settlement Dispo Conf set for 4:00 2/17/06 before Mag Judge Jan Adler unless a signed stipulation for dismissal is submitted prior to that time (dkt clerk)
December 15, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler: E.N.E. Conference is rescheduled to 2:00 1/20/06 before Mag Judge Jan Adler (dkt clerk)
December 1, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Notice and Order by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler: It is hereby ordered that an E.N.E. Conference will be held 2:00 1/11/06 before Mag Judge Jan Adler (dkt clerk)
November 28, 2005 Filing 6 Answer to complaint by defendant Carrizo Gorge; jury demand (axr)
November 22, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Stipulation and Order by Judge Thomas J. Whelan Answer ddl extended to 11/28/05 for Carrizo Gorge (axr)
November 7, 2005 Filing 4 Return of Service executed upon defendant Carrizo Gorge on 10/27/05 (smv)
October 12, 2005 Filing 3 Summons issued (axr)
October 11, 2005 Filing 2 Notice of Party with Financial Interest by Barry Jones (dkt clerk)
October 11, 2005 Filing 1 Complaint Filed; (referred to Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler ) Receipt No/Amt of Fee: 117847,$250.00 t/w jury demand (dkt clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Carrizo Gorge, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry Jones
Represented By: Ryan David Fischbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carrizo Gorge Railway, Inc.
Represented By: Robert Louis Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?