Latimer v. SD Cty Government, et al
| 3:2005cv02090 |
| November 9, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Jeffrey T Miller |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
AMENDED CLERK'S JUDGMENT - the court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendant Orr and against Plaintiff Latimer. As all claims against all parties have now been adjudicated in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff, the Clerk of Court is instructed to enter final judgment in the case and to close the file.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (Main Document 132 replaced and regenerated NEF on 5/12/2010) (tkl).
|
|
Filing
131
CLERK'S JUDGMENT - the court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendant Orr and against Plaintiff Latimer. As all claimsagainst all parties have now been adjudicated in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl)
|
|
Filing
130
ORDER granting 127 Motion for summary judgment in favor of Defendant Orr and against Plaintiff Latimer. As all claims against all parties have now been adjudicated in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff, the Clerk of Court is instructed to enter final judgment in the case and to close the file. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 5/10/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER granting 119 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 11/23/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 100 Defendant's motion to dismiss. The court grants the motion to dismiss of Defendants Runyen, Goldstein and Garcia but denies the motion to dismiss of Defendant Orr. Defendant Orr is instructed to file an answer within 15 days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/28/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 99 Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 7/24/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 1/4/2009. Court construes Plaintiff's Notice that the Fourth Amended Complaint my be filed 10 days late, as a Motion for Enlargement of Time. Court grants Pla lave to file Fourth Amended Complaint by 1/16/2009. (Notice not on the docket) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Latimer v. SD Cty Government, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
