Haithcock v. Veal
| 3:2006cv00100 |
| January 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Jan M. Adler |
| Napoleon A. Jones |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court overrules Petitioner's Objections and Adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Court denies the Petition and a Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not issue in this case. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER ADOPTING 63 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and denies Haithcock's motion for leave to amend his petition. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(llb)
|
|
Filing
63
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 51 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Thomas Ouia Haithcock. Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2009. Reply to objection shall be filed with the Court and served on all parties within 10 days of being erved with the objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jan M. Adler on 05/22/09. (bjb) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Haithcock v. Veal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
