Brody, et al v. Dot Hill Systems, et al
| 3:2006cv00228 |
| January 31, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| William McCurine |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER Granting Defendants' 92 Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing Without Prejudice: If Plaintiffs elect to file an amended complaint, they shall file within fourteen (14) days of the date this Order is electronically filed. If Plaintiffs file a Fourth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint, they shall lodge and serve a redlined copy within five (5) business days of the electronic filing. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 3/18/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(pdc) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brody, et al v. Dot Hill Systems, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
