Chaker v. Law Offices of Winn, et al
| 3:2006cv00599 |
| March 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Marilyn L. Huff |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER granting 13 Plaintiff's Petition to Re-open the Case; and granting in part and denying in part 16 Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Seal. the Court grants Plaintiffs petition to re-open the case.The Court then grants in part and denies in part Plaintiffs supplemental motion to seal. Consistent with this Order, the Court directs the Clerk to replace Plaintiffs name with John Doe on the docket and in all publicly and electronically available documents so as to conceal his true name. Thereafter, the Court directs the Clerk to re-close the case. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 6/28/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmr)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying In Part Plaintiff's Motion to Seal [Doc. No. 11 ]. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 6/21/2021.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chaker v. Law Offices of Winn, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
