Medina v. Evans, et al
3:2006cv01122 |
May 23, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Irma E Gonzalez |
William McCurine |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER Adopting in Full the 30 Report and Recommendation, and Denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: The Court further finds that, should Petitioner appeal, no certificate of appealability should issue. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/29/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(pdc) (av1). |
Filing 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is hereby recommended that the Court issue an Order approving and adopting this Report & Recommendation and directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition. It is ordere d that written Objections to R&R are due by 3/30/2009. The document should be captioned "Objections to Report & Recommendation". Any Replies to the Objections are due by 4/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 3/3/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(leh) (jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Medina v. Evans, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.