Medina v. Evans, et al

Case Number: 3:2006cv01122
Filed: May 23, 2006
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Presiding Judge: Irma E Gonzalez
Referring Judge: William McCurine
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 29, 2009 36 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Adopting in Full the 30 Report and Recommendation, and Denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: The Court further finds that, should Petitioner appeal, no certificate of appealability should issue. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 5/29/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(pdc) (av1).
March 3, 2009 30 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is hereby recommended that the Court issue an Order approving and adopting this Report & Recommendation and directing that Judgment be entered denying the Petition. It is ordere d that written Objections to R&R are due by 3/30/2009. The document should be captioned "Objections to Report & Recommendation". Any Replies to the Objections are due by 4/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 3/3/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(leh) (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medina v. Evans, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?