Henderson v. Ollison, et al

Case Number: 3:2006cv01545
Filed: July 31, 2006
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Presiding Judge: John A. Houston
Referring Judge: William McCurine
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: &

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 24, 2009 74 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Adopting the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations [Docs. # 50, 71]; Overruling Petitioner's Objections [Docs. #58, 73]; Denying Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing [Doc. #66] and Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in its Entirety. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 9/23/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(vet) (av1).
March 16, 2009 71 Opinion or Order of the Court REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge: (1) denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on Petitioner's false evidence claim 62 and 64 ; and (2) denying 66 Petitioner's motion for evidentiary hearing. Objections to R&R due by 4/6/2009. Replies due by 4/27/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 03/16/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jpp) (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henderson v. Ollison, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?