Ortiz v. Tilton
| Marcos Antonio Ortiz |
| James E Tilton and Edmund G. Brown |
| 3:2006cv01752 |
| September 29, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Monterey |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| M. James Lorenz |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Overruling Petitioner's Objections; Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Entry of Judgment. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/16/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj) (kaj). Modified on 6/25/2009 to correct signature date (mjj)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING 23 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Denying 18 Motion to Hold Proceedings in Abeyance as Moot and Denying Leave to File and Amended Complaint: IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the action proceed forward with the claims in the original petition and that the stay of the Courts previously issued Report and Recommendation 14 is lifted. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/9/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)
|
|
Filing
23
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 18 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus: This Court RECOMMENDS that Petitioners Motion for leave to file the Amended Petition be DENIED, that this action PROCEED FORWARD with the cl aims in the original Petition and that the stay on this Courts previous Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 14] be LIFTED. Objections to R&R due by 10/10/2008, Any reply to the objections due no later than 10 days after being served with the objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 9/8/2008. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
