Bowling v. Hernandez

Case Number: 3:2006cv02477
Filed: November 13, 2006
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Presiding Judge: Marilyn L. Huff
Referring Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 26, 2009 30 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Overruling Petitioner's 29 Objections, Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 28 Report and Recommendation, Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and Denying Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 02/26/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mkz) (jrl).
November 15, 2006 2 Opinion or Order of the Court Notice regarding possible failure to exhaust and one-year statute of limitations. Signed by Judge Nita L. Stormes on 11/15/06. (r1r)
November 14, 2006 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER requiring response to petition. Respondent shall file a motion to dismiss no later 1/5/07. If Respondent files a motions to dismiss, petitioner shall file his motions no later than 1/30/07; or the respondent shall file an answer no later than 1/22/07. Petitioner may file a traverse to matters raised in the answer no later than 2/21/07. Signed by Judge Nita L. Stormes on 11/15/06. (r1r)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bowling v. Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?