Ravet v. Solomon, Ward, Seidenwurm & Smith et al
| Gary K Ravet |
| Solomon, Ward, Seidenwurm & Smith, Ashworth, Blanchet, Christenson, & Kalemkirian, LLC, Paul Metsch, Edward McIntyre, Lesa Christenson, Marc O Stern, Meryl Zinn, Does 1 through 100 and Joel Wohlfeil |
| 3:2007cv00031 |
| January 4, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Jeffrey T. Miller |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
215
ORDER denying 208 Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/22/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 189 Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees: this Court grants Defendant's motion for attorneys' fees in the amount of $14,075. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 8/6/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)
|
|
Filing
67
Joint motion re extension of time for dft Lesa Christenson to respond to pla's first amended complaint 65. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 8/9/07. (tkl)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting motions to dismiss, denying motions to strike as moot and dismissing complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 7/17/07. (tkl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
