Hayes v. Tilton

Petitioner: Albert Hayes
Respondent: J E Tilton
Case Number: 3:2007cv00533
Filed: March 21, 2007
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: John A. Houston
Referring Judge: Leo S. Papas
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 28, 2011 74 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Denying Petition for Habeas Corpus; Denying a Certificate of Appealability; Denying as moot Petitioner's 73 Motion for Ruling on Pending Objection Pleading; Denying as moot Petitioner's 70 Motion to Appoint Counsel and/or Discovery Process. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 6/28/11.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cge)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hayes v. Tilton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Albert Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: J E Tilton
Represented By: Pamela Ratner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?