Johnson et al v. Executive Protective Agency K-9 & Investigative Services, Inc. et al
| Charlie Johnson and Bessie Johnson |
| Franklin R. Whiteley, Executive Protective Agency K-9 & Investigative Services, Inc., Park Crest Apartments and Does 6-100 |
| 3:2007cv00570 |
| March 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Anthony J. Battaglia |
| Napoleon A. Jones |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
ORDER granting 113 Defendants Brian Sullivan and Luis Laras Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs fifth cause of action for assault and battery is DISMISSED. Denying 113 Defendants Motion to Strike as moot. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 2/17/2011. (amh)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER finding as moot 63 Motion to Dismiss, 63 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, 75 Motion to Dismiss, 75 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 76 Motion for Summary Judgment, 77 Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting 86 Motion for Leave to File Proposed Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Napoleon A. Jones, Jr on 09/28/09. (bjb) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER vacating Pretrial Conference. The Pretrial Conference set for 8/31/09 is hereby vacated; The Court will reschedule the Pretrial Conference after it has ruled on the pending motions.. Signed by Judge Napoleon A. Jones, Jr on 7/29/09. (ksr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
