Jenkins v. Barstow

Jenkins v. Barstow

Petitioner:	Raymond Jenkins
Respondent:	Barstow
Case Number:	3:2007cv00871
Filed:	May 11, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Bernadino
Presiding Judge:	Roger T. Benitez
Presiding Judge:	Peter C. Lewis
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 20, 2007	Filing 10 ORDER, Based on the foregoing, the Court DISMISSES Petitioners Third Amended Petition because he has again failed to cure the pleading deficiencies outlined in this Courts three previous Orders. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Any further request for relief must be filed as a new case. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 08/20/07. (joeh)
August 6, 2007	Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Court DENIES the request to proceed in forma pauperis and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must satisfy the filing fee requirement and file a Third Amended Petition no later th an August 31, 2007 in conformance with this Order. Petitioner is advised that if he has not corrected the pleading deficiencies outlined in this Order by August 31, 2007, he will have to start over by filing a new Petition in this Court. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 08/06/07. (a blank Third Amended Petition form attached to this Order sent to petitioner)(joeh)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 20, 2007

Filing 10 ORDER, Based on the foregoing, the Court DISMISSES Petitioners Third Amended Petition because he has again failed to cure the pleading deficiencies outlined in this Courts three previous Orders. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Any further request for relief must be filed as a new case. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 08/20/07. (joeh)

August 6, 2007

Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Court DENIES the request to proceed in forma pauperis and DISMISSES this action without prejudice. To have this case reopened, Petitioner must satisfy the filing fee requirement and file a Third Amended Petition no later th an August 31, 2007 in conformance with this Order. Petitioner is advised that if he has not corrected the pleading deficiencies outlined in this Order by August 31, 2007, he will have to start over by filing a new Petition in this Court. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 08/06/07. (a blank Third Amended Petition form attached to this Order sent to petitioner)(joeh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. Barstow
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Raymond Jenkins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Barstow
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?