Rogers v. Bishop
Plaintiff: Karla K Rogers
Defendant: Thomas "Tom" Bishop
Case Number: 3:2007cv00896
Filed: May 17, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Anthony J. Battaglia
Presiding Judge: Napoleon A. Jones
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 22, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER setting E.N.E. Conf., Briefing Schedule and Briefing Requirements; Early Neutral Evaluation set for 6/27/2007 10:00 AM in Courtroom A before Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia; Signed by Magistrate Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 5/22/07. (kaj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rogers v. Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karla K Rogers
Represented By: Deborah Neville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas "Tom" Bishop
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?