Johnson v. Almager et al
| Aaron D Johnson |
| V M Almager, Laurie A Shipman, D J Degeus, A Favila, G J Giurbino and C Cook |
| 3:2007cv00957 |
| July 16, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Imperial |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| William McCurine |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER Granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment; Adopting 78 Report and Recommendations. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and Grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and terminate the case. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/28/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, imposing no initial partial filing fee, garnishing $350 from prisoner's trust account; Directing USM to effect service pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(2) and 28 USC 1915 (d); G ranting 6 Plaintiff's Request to have USM serve summons upon defendants as moot. IFP packet prepared and sent to Plaintiff, copy of order served on James Tilton, Secretary of California Dept of Corrections. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/13/07. (vrp)(bar, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
