Reyes v. Marshall

Petitioner: Gaudencio Vivar Reyes
Respondent: John Marshall
Case Number: 3:2007cv01187
Filed: June 29, 2007
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Luis Obispo
Referring Judge: Ruben B. Brooks
Presiding Judge: Napoleon A. Jones
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 11, 2010 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 20 Report and Recommendations; Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and Denying Petitioner's Request for Evidentiary Hearing. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 1/11/10.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(asw) (kaj).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reyes v. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gaudencio Vivar Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: John Marshall
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?