Bridgewater v. Scriben

Petitioner: Keith R Bridgewater
Respondent: A.K. Scriben
Case Number: 3:2007cv01340
Filed: July 23, 2007
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge: John A. Houston
Referring Judge: William McCurine
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 6, 2007 3 Opinion or Order of the Court CLERK'S JUDGMENT; The Habeas Corpus Petition is denied without prejudice. (jpp)
August 3, 2007 2 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Dismissing Habeas Petition without prejudice as second or successive. (Blank application for leave to file second or successive petition mailed to Petitioner). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 08/02/07. (jpp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bridgewater v. Scriben
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Keith R Bridgewater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: A.K. Scriben
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?