Plaintiff Veoh Networks, Inc. is a video hosting service that provides a mechanism for third parties to share video on the Internet. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that (1) it has no liability to defendants for the unsolicited posting of content on the Veoh website; (2) it is not liable for direct, contributory or vicarious infringement of defendants' copyrights; (3) it is not liable for inducing the infringement of any of defendants' copyrights; (4) defendants are not entitled to any injunctions against plaintiff; and (5) it is entitled to safe harbor pursuant to 17 USC § 512(c).
Veoh Networks, Inc. |
UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music Corp., Songs of Universal , Inc., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Rondor Music International, Inc. and DOES |
3:2007cv01568 |
August 9, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Thomas J. Whelan |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing
29
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. The Court grants Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Transfer and dismisses Plaintiff's case without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of Rondor Music International, Inc., Songs of Universal, Inc., UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music Corp., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc. against Veoh Networks, Inc. (aje)
|
Filing
28
ORDER granting 20 Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss or Transfer; Order granting 23 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply; and Order granting 13 Motion to Dismiss or transfer, and dismissing Plaintiff's case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 11/13/07. (aje)
|
Filing
26
NOTICE by UMG Recordings, Inc. re 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Transfer, of Central District Order (Glatstein, Benjamin) (kmm ).
|
Filing
25
RESPONSE in Opposition re 23 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply in Support of Voeh's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Tranfer filed by UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music Corp., Songs of Universal, Inc., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Rondor Music International, Inc., DOES. (Brown, Elliot) Modified on 10/15/2007 to edit text (aje).
|
Filing
20
Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply In Support of Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, Transfer by UMG Recordings, Inc., Universal Music Corp., Songs of Universal, Inc., Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc., Rondor Music International, Inc., DOES. (Glatstein, Benjamin) Modified on 10/31/07, notified atty document does not contain proper electronic signature (aje).
|
Filing
19
RESPONSE in Opposition re 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or, in the Alternative, to Transfer, filed by Veoh Networks, Inc.. (Lawlor, Rebecca) (aje).
|
Filing 18 |
Filing
16
PRO HAC VICE APPOINTED: Michael S Elkin appearing for Plaintiff Veoh Networks, Inc. Local Counsel Rebecca Lawlor Calkins. (aje)
|
Filing
9
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Veoh Networks, Inc.. Universal-Polygram International Publishing, Inc. served on 8/13/2007, answer due 9/3/2007. (Lawlor, Rebecca)
|
Filing
4
Filed ORDER granting 3 Motion to file notice of party with financial interest under seal.. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 8/13/07. (cmy)
|
Filing
2
Summons Issued. (jmp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.