Hooper v. County of San Diego et al
Deborah Hooper |
County of San Diego, San Diego County Sheriff's Department, -, William B Kolender, Kirk Terrell and Does 1 through 10 |
3:2007cv01647 |
August 27, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
John A. Houston |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 510 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict, or in the Alternative, A New Trial 494 Motion for Judgment NOV. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 3/27/2024. (bdc) |
Filing 509 ORDER Vacating Hearing. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 2/18/2022.(ddf) |
Filing 426 ORDER denying 401 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to designate additional experts. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 11/05/2020. (jpp) |
Filing 421 ORDER Denying 400 Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 9/2/2020. (tcf) |
Filing 352 ORDER Granting 344 Defendants' Motion Allowing Defendants to Bring Exhibit in Courtroom During Trial. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 2/24/2020. (tcf) |
Filing 32 ORDER Granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment: Defendants' motion for summary judgment came on regularly for hearing before this Court on 5/18/2009. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 5/20/2009. (mjj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.