Fosselman v. Tilton et al
| Jerome Fosselman |
| James Tilton, Victor M Almager, Candie Cook and Cummings |
| 3:2007cv01676 |
| January 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Imperial |
| Napoleon A. Jones |
| William McCurine |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER denying w/o prejudice Plaintiff's 34 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Court finds that Pla has failed to plead facts sufficient to the exceptional circumstances required for appointment of counsel pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(1). Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 4/27/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER granting Pla's 6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 1/18/2008. Secy of CA Dept of Corrections ordered to collect from Pla's prison trust acct the $350 balance in amount equal to 20% of the preceding month's income credited to the acct and forward to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the acct exceeds $10 in accordance to 28 USC 1915(b)(2). USMS shall serve copy of Complaint and Summons upon each Dft. Dft ordered to reply to Complaint w/in time provided by FRCP 12(a). IFP Package prepared and mailed to Pla. Copy of the Order mailed to James Tilton, Secy of Dept of Corrections. (jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
