Mancini et al v. The Insurance Corporation of New York et al
| Carol Mancini and San Marino Plastering, Inc. |
| The Insurance Corporation of New York and DOES |
| 3:2007cv01750 |
| September 6, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 65 Defendant's Ex Parte Motion to Stay Proceedings: Defendant's ex parte motion to stay proceedings is DENIED with respect to plaintiffs first and second causes of action for breach of contract, and is GRANTED IN PART with respect to plaintiffs claims based on breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. INSCORP shall within 30 days communicate this courts decision to the New York Supreme Court and the New York Superintendent of Insurance. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the action shall proceed immediately as to plaintiffs breach of contract claims. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/15/2010. (mjj) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER Denying 61 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply: The Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply Brief is DENIED; The Request to Strike the timely filed Reply Brief is DENIED; and The Request to Strike the Additional Lozano Declaration and Report is GRANTED and the Clerk of Court is directed to strike Docket Numbers 55 and 56. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 6/23/2009. (mjj) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Granting 37 Motion to Compel Production of Documents; Granting in part and Denying in part 41 Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories: It Is Hereby Ordered that The Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatories is GRANTED and no later than July 13, 2009 Plaintiffs shall supplement their responses to the Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents as described herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than July 13, 2009 the parties shall submit a Joint Motion for Protective Order governing the use of confidential documents in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 6/18/2009. (mjj) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
