Marriott International, Inc. v. That Certain Sailing Vessel of Approximately 47.2 Feet and 21 Gross Tons, in rem
| Marriott International, Inc. |
| That certain sailing vessel of approximately 47.2 feet and 21 gross tons |
| 3:2007cv01829 |
| September 18, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William McCurine |
| Dana M. Sabraw |
| Contract: Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marriott International, Inc. v. That Certain Sailing Vessel of Approximately 47.2 Feet and 21 Gross Tons, in rem | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marriott International, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Philip E Weiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: That certain sailing vessel of approximately 47.2 feet and 21 gross tons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
