San Diego Unified Port District v. General Dynamics Corporation et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 20, 2017
ORDER granting 105 Motion for Order to Confirm Settlement and 105 Motion to Dismiss Claims. The Settlement Agreement is approved as a good faith settlement. Pursuant to sections 877 and 877.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, CERCLA sect ion 113(f)(1), and approach taken by Section 6 of the UCFA, and all claims for contribution or equitable indemnity against the parties arising out of the facts alleged in the complaints, counterclaims, or cross-claims, regardless of when such claims are asserted or by whom, relating to Covered Matters under the Settlement Agreement are hereby barred. All claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, or any other claims that have been made by and between the parties are dismissed with prejudice. Court sh all retain jurisdiction over both the subject matter of this Settlement Agreement and the parties for the duration of the performance of the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement. The parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. The Clerk shall file this Order in both actions. This Order shall constitute the "Order Approving Agreement" under Section 5.2 of the Settlement Agreement. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 6/20/2017. (jah)
|October 10, 2013
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Liability for One-Third of Investigation Costs at the Tow Basin Site (Doc. 51 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 10/10/2013. (srm)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?