Lucent Technologies, Inc. et al v. Gateway, Inc. et al
| Microsoft Corporation and Lucent Technologies, Inc. |
| Lucent Technologies, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation |
| Microsoft Corporation and Lucent Technologies, Inc. |
| Microsoft Corporation |
| 3:2007cv02000 |
| October 16, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Marilyn L. Huff |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
1478
ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Microsoft's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and in the Alternative, a New Trial with a Remittitur (Doc. Nos. 1432 , 1433 , 1434 ). The Court enters a final judgment in Lucents favor, inclusive of costs and pre-judgment interest, in the amount of $40,995,486.67. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 11/10/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(knb)
|
|
Filing
1323
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 1302 Defendant Microsoft's Motion in Limine Concerning Sims' Supplemental Expert Report. The Court grants the motion in limine to exclude Lucents Supplemental Exhibit 5.1, but reserves the right to revisit the ruling. The Court also grants the motion in limine to exclude Lucents alternative analysis of damages. The Court denies the motion to exclude the business realities approach without prejudice to any contemporaneous objections at trial and subject to any post-trial motions. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 7/13/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mtb)
|
|
Filing
1186
ORDER (1) Denying in Part and Granting in Part Microsoft's Motion to Redact; (2) Denying in Part and Granting in Part Microsoft's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Microsoft's Motion to Redact; and (3) Denying in Part and Granting in Part Microsoft's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Microsoft's Reply to Motion to Redact. The parties are directed to meet and confer to determine if the motion and reply contain information that require redaction pursuant to this order. If necessary, the parties are to submit redactions of Microsoft's motion and reply on or before March 4, 2011. Signed by Judge Marilyn L. Huff on 2/25/11. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
