Shames et al v. Hertz Corporation et al
Michael Shames and Gary Gramkow |
Hertz Corporation, Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc., Avis Budget Group, Inc., Vanguard Car Rental USA Inc., Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company, Fox Rent A Car, Inc., Coast Leasing Corp., The California Travel and Tourism Commission and Caroline Bateta |
3:2007cv02174 |
November 14, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Marilyn L. Huff |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1 Antitrust Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 394 ORDER Granting 383 Motion for FRAP 7 Appeal Bond. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the posting of an appeal bond is warranted and the amount of $15,000.00 requested by Class Counsel is reasonable. By 7/10/2013, Objectors G ordon Hansmeier; Thomas Lavery; and Cery Perle, Gary Bishop, Frank de Julius, and Andrew Cesare must either post a $15,000 bond or file a notice of dismissal of their appeal. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 6/18/2013. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) (jrl). |
Filing 357 ORDER Granting 327 Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and For Entry of Judgment, 328 Motion for Attorney Fees; and Judgment and Dismissal: This Court Approves the settlement and Orders the parties to effectuate the settlem ent agreement according to its terms. The Court Dismisses this case on the merits and with prejudice, pursuant to the terms of the parties settlement agreement. If this Judgment and the settlement do not become final and effective in accord with th e terms of the settlement agreement, then this Judgment and all orders entered in connection therewith shall be deemed null and void and shall be vacated. The Court shall not retain continuing jurisdiction over implementation of the settlement or future disputes over construing, enforcing, or administering the settlement. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 11/5/2012. (leh) |
Filing 345 ORDER Denying 341 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Motion to Intervene. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/15/2012. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 313 AMENDED ORDER Preliminarily Approving Settlement, Certifying Settlement Class, Appointing Class Representative and Lead Counsel, and Providing For Notice re: 310 MOTION for Preliminary Approval Of Class Action Settlement, Certification Of Settlement Class, Appointment Of Class Representative And Class Counsel And Approval Of Form And Manner Of Giving Not filed by Gary Gramkow. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/22/2012.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Filing 311 ORDER preliminarily approving settlement, certifying settlement class, appointing class representative and lead counsel, and providing for notice. A hearing (the "Final Approval Hearing") shall be held before this Court on October 29, 2012, at 2:30 p.m. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/21/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs) |
Filing 248 ORDER denying 191 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Without Prejudice to Re-File. For the reasons stated herein, the Court denies Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment without prejudice. In addition, the Court orders that the stay imposed in this action is hereby lifted. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 2/23/2011. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(leh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.