Terry v. Woodford et al
| William Terry |
| Jean Woodford, Robert J Hernandez, J Ritter, Kinji L Hawthorne, Giannini, Choo and J Hunt |
| 3:2007cv02360 |
| December 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| San Bernardino |
| Napoleon A. Jones |
| Louisa S Porter |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 28 ex parte application to Stay action for 90-day period. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 4/15/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Dismiss; Adopting in part and denying in part 20 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Napoleon A. Jones, Jr on 09/28/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(bjb) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 MOTION to Dismiss is recommended to be GRANTED and MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint to be GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part filed by Choo, J Hunt, J Ritter, Flores. Hernandez, McBride. Objections to R&R due by 8/6/2009 Replies due no later than 10 days after being served with the Objections. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S. Porter on 07/06/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(bjb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
