Baker et al v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company et al
| Freling Baker and Natalie Jensen |
| Hartford Casualty Insurance Company and Does 1-20 |
| 3:2007cv02426 |
| December 28, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
ORDER Confirming Settlement And Setting Deadline To File Joint Motion For Dismissal: A Early Neutral Evaluation Conference was held on 2/5/08 at 01:30 PM. The case settled and the terms of the settlement were placed on the record. A joint motion for dismissal, signed by counsel of record and all parties, must be filed no later than 3/6/08. If the fully executed joint motion for dismissal is not filed by 3/6/08, then all counsel of record and unrepresented parties are required to appear in person for a Settlement Disposition Conference. The Settlement Disposition Conference will be held on 3/11/08 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A. All other pending dates before Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are vacated. Any matters currently scheduled before the district judge shall remain in effect pending notice from that court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major on 2/6/08. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
