Sorensen v. Ryobi Technologies, Inc. et al
| Jens Erik Sorensen |
| Ryobi Technologies, Inc., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. and DOES |
| 3:2008cv00070 |
| January 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Ruben B. Brooks |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Exception to Stay: Granting in Part and Denying in Part 22 Motion for Exception to Stay. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an Amended Complaint adding accused products within 30 days of this Order. Defen dant must respond to said the Amended Complaint within 45 days after the stay is lifted. The Court denies without prejudice Plaintiffs request for leave of court to use appropriate procedural discovery steps to acquire prototype, production, design, technical documents or evidence regarding the accused products from nonparties at this time; any subsequent requests will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/2/2008. (mjj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
