Newberry v. Barreras et al
| Theodore E Newberry |
| N Barreras and D Khatri |
| 3:2008cv00552 |
| March 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Imperial |
| Peter C. Lewis |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER Denying 21 Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint and Dismissing this Action With Prejudice: The Courts previously granted motion to dismiss was without prejudice. Because of plaintiffs misrepresentation to the Court and th e denial of plaintiffs request for an extension of time to file an amended complaint, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/1/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Granting Without Prejudice 9 Motion to Dismiss; and Granting Leave to Amend the Complaint: Plaintiff may file an amended complaint that complies with the issues raised in the Report. If plaintiff intends to prosecute this action, the amended complaint shall be filed and served on opposing counsel no later than February 6, 2009. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/9/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
