-RBB Ashford v. Goeppinger-Curran Development LLC et al
Burk N. Ashford |
Goeppinger-Curran Development LLC, Thomas W. Curran, Neil W. Goeppinger, F. Virginia Goeppinger and DOES |
3:2008cv00949 |
March 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
Ruben B. Brooks |
William Q. Hayes |
Real Property: Other |
23 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Contract Real Estate |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER: The Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, for failure to serve Defendants, and for failure to comply with this Court's Order to Show Cause. This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the case. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/2/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (kaj). |
Filing 29 ORDER: (1) Motion for Contempt and Seizure of Documents against Superior Court of San Diego County (Doc. 19 ); (2) Motion for Court Order Clerks Entry of Default (Doc. 21 ); (3) Motion for Contempt and Seizure of Documents against Chicago Title Com pany (Doc. 24 ); (4) Motion for Contempt and Seizure of Documents against San Diego Superior Court (Doc. 26 ); and (5) Motion for Contempt and Seizure of Documents against Chicago Title Company (Doc. 28 ) are denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 8/13/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (av1). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.