Chrisman v. Smith et al
| Ronald Chrisman |
| David Smith, M. Sheridan, M.X. McCurty, D. Koludrovic, K. Hawthorne, Uknown Escalante, Unknown Richards, R.N. Marquez, DOES and C. Navamani |
| 3:2008cv00975 |
| June 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| San Diego |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Leo S. Papas |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER Granting Defendants' 70 Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismisses with Prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Sheridan, Escalante, and Marquez. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 12/16/2010. (knh)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 56 Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. Court grants Dfts Smith and McCurty's motion to dismiss Pla's claims under the Eighth Amendment, denies Dft Marquez's motion t o dismiss Pla's claims under the Eighth Amendment, grants Dfts' motion to dismiss Pla's substantive due process and equal protection claims under the Fourteenth Amendment and grants Dfts' motion to dismiss Pla's claims agains t them in their official capacities. Court dismisses Pla's claims against Dfts Smith and McCurty w/ prejudice and w/o leave to amend. Dfts Sheridan, Escalante and Marquez are ordered to file a Answer to the Second Amended Complaint w/in 10 days after the filing of this Order. Court orders Pla to show cause w/in 10 days of the filing of this Order, why Pla's claims against Dft Dr. Richards should not be dismissed pursuant to FRCP Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 2/5/2010. (jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/31/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service). (jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting Plaintiff's 45 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend. Pla may file a Second Amended Complaint no later than 30 days from the date this Order is filed. Defendants' 43 Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint is denied as moot, subject to renewal if Pla elects not file a Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/19/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
