Henslee v. Wilson et al
| Lance R Henslee |
| C Wilson and V Sosa |
| 3:2008cv01015 |
| June 16, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Lassen |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Leo S. Papas |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is in favor of Defendants against Plaintiff. Court grants Dfts' motion to dismiss in its entirety. Case closed. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) \(av1).
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER granting Defendants' 35 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Court grants Dfts' motion to dismiss in its entirety. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/17/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (av1).
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 19 Motion to Dismiss. Court dismisses w/o prejudice Pla's 8th Amendment failure to protect claim and 8th Amendment excessive force claim. Court denies Dfts' motion to dismiss pla 's retaliation claim. Pla may amend his Complaint to cure the deficiencies w/in 28 days of the filing of this Order. If Pla chooses to amend, he must reallege all claims against all dfts or they will be waived. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 2/5/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
