Genchev v. Detroit Diesel Corporation
Plaintiff: Eugene Genchev
Defendant: Detroit Diesel Corporation
Case Number: 3:2008cv01021
Filed: June 6, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Nita L. Stormes
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. Whelan
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER Denying (Doc. 38 ) Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 2/25/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cap) (jrl).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Genchev v. Detroit Diesel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eugene Genchev
Represented By: Douglas Jaffee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Detroit Diesel Corporation
Represented By: Philip R Cosgorve
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?