The United States of America v. 2.74 acres of land et al
The United States of America |
2.74 acres of land, Ronald K. Bagley, Elsie A. Bagley, Ace Associates, Inc., Monte Cristo Mining Corporation, Densil Harvey, Novox Trust and Holding Company Limited, TEK Corporation, Imperial Irrigation District and Imperial County Tax Collector |
3:2008cv01228 |
July 9, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Condemnation Office |
San Diego |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Marilyn L. Huff |
None |
U.S. Government Plaintiff |
40:258(a) Public Buildings & Property: Land Condemnation |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 CLERK'S JUDGMENT IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. Court grants 18 Joint Motion for Order Establishing Compensation and Distributing Funds. Judgment is entered against The United States of America in the amount of $2,429.00. Clerk of Court s hall withdraw the sum of $2,429.00 along with any interest earned, and deduct ten percent of the acrrued interest as authorzed by the Judicial Conference of the United States. Clerk shall disburse the $2,429.00, plus any interest, minus the authorized deduction to Defendants Ronald K. Bagkley and Eslie A. Bagley. Parties shall take no appeal from any rulings or judgments made by Court in this action. Case is closed. (jah) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/4/2009: # 1 Main Document - Corrected) (jah). Modified on 6/4/2009 - Corrected spelling in pdf. Pdf added, regenerated NEF (jah). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.