Hoot Winc, LLC v. RSM McGladrey Financial et al
Hoot Winc, LLC |
RSM McGladrey Financial, Process Outsourcing, LLC and DOES |
3:2008cv01559 |
August 22, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Contract: Other Office |
San Diego |
William McCurine |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 264 RULING following Teleconference re: Joint Discovery Plan. The new discovery cut-off date is February 17, 2012. The new Pretrial Conference date before the Honorable Barry T. Moskowitz is May 15, 2012, at 3:30p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 9/12/11.(ecs)(jrd) |
Filing 262 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 185 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.The motion is Granted as to Plaintiffs Fourth Cause of Action for negligent misrepresentation. The motion is Denied as to the remaining causes of action. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 9/6/11. (ecs)(jrd) |
Filing 233 ORDER Denying 157 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law Precluding Plaintiff from Seeking or Recovering Damages Allegedly Sustained by Non Prty Entities. Plaintiff has not specifically pled the agency theory in its Second Amended Complaint. However, even during trial, the Court may permit the amendment of pleadings to conform to the evidence. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(b). Therefore, the Court grants Plaintiff leave to file a Third Amended Complaint which pleads the agency theory of liability. The Third Amended Complaint must be filed within 20 days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 2/22/2011. (jer)(jrd). |
Filing 232 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Request for Discovery Conference/In Camera Review. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 2/18/11.(jer) |
Filing 183 Ruling Re: Designation of Hansen and Supplementation of Witnesses. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiff's seven witnesses. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motion to compel the production of CBIZ documents. The documents at issue shall be produced no later than October 15, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 9/29/2010.(jer) |
Filing 159 ORDER RE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF 158 MOTION TO FILE EXHIBIT L UNDER SEAL. Plaintiff's opinion that Exhibit L is "confidential" is not enough in and of itself to justify filing the exhibit under seal. If Plaintiff wants Exhibit L to be filed under seal, Plaintiff must file a supplemental brief explaining why the exhibit should be sealed. The supplemental briefmust be filed on or before September 7, 2010. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/18/2010.(jer) |
Filing 149 ORDER Regarding the Parties' Respective Motions to Compel Further Answers to Interrogatories. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 7/12/10.(vet) |
Filing 144 ORDER Ruling Following In Camera Review Denying Application of Attorney-Client Privilege to January 8, 2007 Email. The Court hereby orders Defendant to produce the document identified in the May 17, 2010 privilege log to Plaintiff on or before June 25, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr. on 6/11/10.(vet) |
Filing 93 AMENDED Ruling Re: Plaintiff's Privilege Log and Application of Privileges. Defendants must receive documents 1, 5 and 14 through and including 16 pursuant to the protective order in place in the above-entitled matter on or before November 23, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 11/16/09. (vet) (jrl). |
Filing 92 ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part Defendant's 73 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 11/12/09. (vet) (jrl). |
Filing 88 ORDER RE: Plaintiff's Privilege Log and Application of Privileges. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 11/4/09. (vet) (jrl). |
Filing 38 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Protective Order With Sharing Provision. Signed by Magistrate Judge William McCurine, Jr on 2/5/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(vet) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.