Sellers v. Astrue

Sellers v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Catherine Sellers
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	3:2008cv01584
Filed:	October 14, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Presiding Judge:	M. James Lorenz
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 11, 2010	Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Overruling Objections; Granting 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying 14 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and Remanding Case for an Award of Benefits: The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/10/2010. (Certified copy sent to SSA via U.S. Mail Service)(mjj)
February 9, 2010	Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Catherine Sellers, 14 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael J Astrue. Recommending Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be GRANTED and the Commissioners cross-mo tion for summary judgment be DENIED. This Court further recommends that this case be REMANDED for an award of benefits Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2010 Replies due by 3/2/2010.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 2/9/2010.(mjj) (jrl).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 11, 2010

Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; Overruling Objections; Granting 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying 14 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and Remanding Case for an Award of Benefits: The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/10/2010. (Certified copy sent to SSA via U.S. Mail Service)(mjj)

February 9, 2010

Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Catherine Sellers, 14 Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Michael J Astrue. Recommending Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be GRANTED and the Commissioners cross-mo tion for summary judgment be DENIED. This Court further recommends that this case be REMANDED for an award of benefits Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2010 Replies due by 3/2/2010.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 2/9/2010.(mjj) (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sellers v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherine Sellers
Represented By:	Josephine Arno
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	U S Attorney CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?