Hefner v. Chao, et al
Richard Randall Hefner |
Elaine Chao, United States Marine Corp. and George Walker Bush |
3:2008cv01586 |
August 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office |
San Diego |
M. James Lorenz |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
28:2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER Granting With Prejudice 8 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Directing Entry of Judgment: IT IS ORDERED granting defendants motion to dismiss with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to enter judgment in defendants favor and against plaintiff. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 8/11/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj) (av1). |
Filing 14 ORDER Denying 13 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and Granting Extension of Time: Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration is DENIED; however, plaintiff may file with the Clerk of the Court and serve on opposing counsel his response in oppo sition to defendants motion to dismiss along with a certificate of service no later than April 22, 2009. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED. Defendants shall file a reply memorandum not later than April 29, 2009. The matter will be deemed submitted without oral argument on April 30, 2009. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/14/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.