Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
| Broadcom Corporation |
| Qualcomm Incorporated and M. ALEXANDER BOWIE, II |
| TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED |
| Qualcomm Incorporated |
| Broadcom Corporation |
| 3:2008cv01607 |
| September 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Anti-Trust Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Leo S. Papas |
| John A. Houston |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:1 Antitrust Litigation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
274
ORDER: The Motion for Leave to File a Sur Reply Memorandum of Points in Opposition to Qualcomm Incorporate's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 265 ) filed by Plaintiff Broadcom Corporation is granted. The Motion to Dismiss Claims Four through Eig ht of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 238 ) filed by Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated is granted. The Fourth through Eighth Claims in the Second Amended Complaint are dismissed insofar as they relate to the Joint Video Team, the H.264 standard, the IEEE 802.20 working group and the IEEE 802.20 standard. The Motion to Deem Qualcomm's Responsive Pleading to be its Answer, Strike Qualcomm's Affirmative Defenses and Related Allegations, and Dismiss Qualcomm's Counterclaims (Doc. 239 ) filed by Plaintiff Broadcom Corporation is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/11/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
