Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Plaintiff: Broadcom Corporation
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated and M. ALEXANDER BOWIE, II
Movant: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
Counter Claimant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Counter Defendant: Broadcom Corporation
Case Number: 3:2008cv01607
Filed: September 3, 2008
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: Anti-Trust Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Leo S. Papas
Presiding Judge: John A. Houston
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1 Antitrust Litigation

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 11, 2009 274 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: The Motion for Leave to File a Sur Reply Memorandum of Points in Opposition to Qualcomm Incorporate's Partial Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 265 ) filed by Plaintiff Broadcom Corporation is granted. The Motion to Dismiss Claims Four through Eig ht of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 238 ) filed by Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated is granted. The Fourth through Eighth Claims in the Second Amended Complaint are dismissed insofar as they relate to the Joint Video Team, the H.264 standard, the IEEE 802.20 working group and the IEEE 802.20 standard. The Motion to Deem Qualcomm's Responsive Pleading to be its Answer, Strike Qualcomm's Affirmative Defenses and Related Allegations, and Dismiss Qualcomm's Counterclaims (Doc. 239 ) filed by Plaintiff Broadcom Corporation is denied. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 3/11/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Broadcom Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Broadcom Corporation
Represented By: Carrie H. Seares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Represented By: Steven M Strauss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. ALEXANDER BOWIE, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Qualcomm Incorporated
Represented By: WILLIAM J. O'SHAUGHNESSY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Broadcom Corporation
Represented By: Carrie H. Seares
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?