Owen v. County of Imperial et al
| Katherine Avilla Owen |
| County of Imperial and Does 1 through 30 |
| 3:2008cv01767 |
| September 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other Office |
| San Diego |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Defendant |
| Federal Question |
| Americans with Disabilities Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Dismissing Complaint Without Prejudice: In the absence of objections, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/19/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjj) (av1).
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Following Order to Show Cause Hearing and Imposing Sanction for Failure to Attend Mandatory Settlement Conference: The court awards sanctions to Defendant and ORDERS Plaintiff to pay the expenses incurred by Defendant and its counsel to attend the MSC in the amount of $1191.52. Plaintiff shall remit the $1191.52 to Defendants counsel no later than April 5, 2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nita L. Stormes on 3/25/2010.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjj) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
