Johnson v. Wennes et al
| Timothy Wennes, Sheila Zuckerman, Countrywide Bank, Countrywide Home Loans, Countrywide Financial Corporation and Bank of America |
| Warren Brad Johnson |
| 3:2008cv01798 |
| October 2, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Real Property: Foreclosure Office |
| San Diego |
| Jan M. Adler |
| M. James Lorenz |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 18:241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER granting Defendants' 29 Motion to Dismiss w/ prejudice. Denying as moot Defendants' motion for a more definite statement. Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 5/4/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(jah) (av1).
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Denying 55 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Leave to File a Sur-Reply: Plaintiffs objection, construed as a motion for reconsideration of the Courts April 20, 2009 Order is DENIED. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/28/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Striking 40 Plaintiff's "First Answer to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for More Definite Statement": Plaintiffs first answer to defendants motion to dismiss and for more definite statement and plaintiffs demand for res ponse to complaint by affidavit of truth is STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD. Because the time has past for filing a response in opposition to defendants motion to dismiss or for more definite statement, if plaintiff seeks to file an opposition that addresse s defendants motion, he must file with the Clerk of the Court and serve upon opposing counsel an ex parte motion for an extension of time in which to file and serve opposing counsel his response in opposition to the motion to dismiss or for more defi nite statement. The ex parte motion for an extension of time must be received by the Clerk of the Court no later than March 9, 2009. The March 2, 2009 hearing on defendants motion to dismiss is VACATED. Defendants are not required to file a reply memorandum unless ordered to do so by the Court. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 2/26/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Denying 33 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment: Plaintiffs motion for default judgment is DENIED. To the extent plaintiffs motion for default judgment is intended to be a request for entry of default, the request is DENIED. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/13/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER Denying With Prejudice 30 Freedom of Information Act Request. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 1/5/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mjj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
