Hill v. United States Bureau of Prisons

Plaintiff: Frankie Hill
Defendant: United States Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 3:2008cv01905
Filed: January 26, 2009
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Louisa S. Porter
Presiding Judge: Janis L. Sammartino
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 12, 2010 27 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 22 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss: Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant United States. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 10/12/10. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(lmt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. United States Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frankie Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?