Cuero v. Adams et al
Michael Daniel Cuero |
Derral G Adams and James E. Tilton |
3:2008cv02008 |
October 29, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
Kings |
Leo S. Papas |
Barry Ted Moskowitz |
None |
Federal Question |
28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and Denies the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus for the reasons set forth in the Report & Recommendations. The Court issues a Certificate of Appealability as to all claims raised in the petition. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs) |
Filing 52 ORDER: (1) Adopting 42 the Findings and Conclusions of United States Magistrate Judge;(2) Denying 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (3) Issuing a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 4/25/12. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ecs) |
Filing 31 ORDER re Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Motion to Suppress Evidence for a Writ of Review and Sentence Modification 12 is denied without prejudice. (3) Respondent's motion for extension of time 25 is granted. Respondent shall file a response to the Petition on or before January 11, 2010. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/7/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(tkl) (jrl). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.