Great American Insurance Company v. Ahmadpoor et al
| Great American Insurance Company |
| Scymack Ahmadpoor, Michael J. O'Halloran, Mission Financial Services Corporation, Mossy Automotive Group, Inc., California Department of Motor Vehicles and DOES |
| 3:2008cv02020 |
| October 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Leo S. Papas |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER granting 38 Joint Motion for Disbursement of Funds and granting 38 Joint Motion to Dismiss. Clerk of Court shall disburse the balance of the Bond deposited w/ this Court. CA DMV shall receive the full amt of its claim of $725.00 from t he deposited interpled funds. Tyrone Steele shall receive $7,500.00 in full satisfaction of his claim from the deposited interpled funds. The remaining balance of the deposited interpled funds in the amt of $41,775.00 and any interest accru ed shall be reimbursed to Plaintiff. Case shall be dismissed w/ prejudice following disbursement of the deposited funds. Plaintiff is discharged of any further liability to the motor vehicle dealer bond of Roman Auto Industries, Inc.. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 7/16/2009. Case closed. (cc: Financial) (jah)(kaj).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
